Editorial

AI Content Policy

Where AI helps, where it doesn't, and where a human always signs off.

Last updated · 2026-05-08

MyLing Workflow Lab is a publication about how to use AI tools well. It would be strange if we didn’t use them ourselves. This page explains exactly where, when, and how we use AI in our editorial process — and where we never let AI decide alone.

Where AI is used

  • Research and outlining. AI summarises documentation and helps explore topic structure.
  • Drafting. First drafts of certain sections may be written with AI assistance, then heavily edited by a human.
  • Editing for clarity and tone. AI helps tighten prose and surface unclear passages.
  • Translation. When localising examples, AI drafts a translation and a human reviews it.

Where AI is never used alone

  • Fact verification. Every product feature claim, number, or quote is checked by a human against primary sources.
  • Recommendations. Tool recommendations come from hands-on use by the editorial team, not from AI synthesis.
  • Final review. A human editor reads every published article in full before it goes live.

What we will not produce

  • Articles whose primary purpose is to manipulate search rankings rather than help readers.
  • Republished AI output that contradicts primary sources or invents tool features.
  • Fake “expert” personas. Every author byline is a real person.

Author attribution

The author name on each article is the human editor who took responsibility for the final piece — including the accuracy and recommendations within it — regardless of which AI tools assisted along the way.

Crawling and AI training

Our public content is open to AI search engines that provide attribution and citations (such as ChatGPT Search and Perplexity). See our robots.txt for the technical specifics. We disallow training-only crawlers that do not provide attribution.

Questions or concerns about how AI is used in the content? Contact us.